When deciding to grant the Special Appeal, determining the return of the case to the court of first to review the matter.
In the judgment of Special Appeal No. 1,854,289 / PB, the Third Panel of the Superior Court of Justice decided on the possibility of suspending the...
In this context, initiatives to use technology to improve the national justice system should be highlighted, always with respect to the constitutional guarantees of the process.
In February 2020, the Federal Senate approved the Bill of Law (PL) No. 1,679 / 2019, which follows for sanction by the Presidency of the Republic,...
In the decision, the reporting rapporteur Paulo de Tarso Sanseverino emphasized that there is no limitation in the matter to be returned in the adhesive appeal.
The Third Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) decided in the judgment of REsp 1.675.996 / SP that in the cases governed by CPC...
For the electric energy sector, Theme 986 addresses a theme with more than 100,000 over-filed processes, which generally demand the exclusion of the ICMS calculation base from TUST and TUSD.
On the 2020 agenda of the Superior Court of Justice there are important judgments that involve various themes, such as, for example, the double repetition provided...
The specific case concerns opposing motions for clarification in the face of a judgment rendered in an interlocutory appeal that was not known due to the absence of a challenge.
The Third Panel of the Superior Court of Justice, in the judgment of the motion for clarification in the Internal Appeal in the Appeal in Special...
